Polza.ai

It’s suitable if you need access to a variety of different models and don’t want to change your IP or pay directly. However, if you’re working with one specific model and in large volumes, it would be easier to get a direct subscription. It will be cheaper. Additionally, some models have unique features that are not available through the aggregator via API. Other than that, everything is fine. It’s a convenient service, with many neural networks gathered in one interface.

Date of experience: фев 19, 2025

This is a useful tool for developers and agencies (regular users would be better off choosing a simpler aggregator if they need access to blocked neural networks). It provides unified access to over 400 neural networks. Almost all existing models are represented here (some of which I heard about for the first time). Therefore, the aggregator is suitable for various tasks – texts, images, code, music, and video. You can work with them via API or through the built-in interface. There is also the option to set up API connections to internal systems (for example, CRM). There are no subscription plans; charges are deducted from the balance during use. The cost depends on the specific model and is calculated separately for incoming and outgoing tokens. For example, a request for GPT-5.2 costs 150 rubles per 1 million tokens, while a response costs 1200 rubles per 1 million tokens. For simpler and older models, the rates are significantly lower.

Date of experience: мар 01, 2025

I invested 500 rubles. I tried Claude at the basic level. I asked a question and received the response "provider error." The same thing happened during my second and third inquiries. In the end, I lost 200 rubles. There is no support. I received an email saying: your request has been registered. Just like at the housing office. Then I got a notification about insufficient funds. According to the site's rules, one should be polite. I follow this rule. I do not recommend it.

Date of experience: июн 10, 2024

I'll start with the positives: 1. Payment is made with tokens, not by rates or limits. The prices are very similar to OpenRouter and are among the lowest, especially for payments from Russia. 2. A wide selection of models. They have everything: from Chinese GLM/Kimi to Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT. In fact, there are a lot of models, including smaller ones, and there are also models for generating photos and videos. 3. Convenient API. Since it is compatible with OpenAI, it can be integrated into any extension or program that supports setting a baseUrl for the provider. Plus, everything works without ***, although I have *** on 99% of the time, but that's not critical, it’s not a downside. I decided to use this service because Claude blocked two of my accounts due to payment with a foreign card, resulting in a loss of over 3,000 rubles. ChatGPT accounts with a monthly subscription last only a week or two before being blocked. That's the reality. After two days of use, I can say that in the end, my monthly expenses will be about the same as a subscription for $20–25 when paying from Russia. I'm not a programmer, but I use it quite often, and it all depends on which model you choose (probably a third of all my requests are Opus 4.6/Gemini 3.1 Pro for architectural planning and Sonnet 4.6/GLM 5 for coding and code review). The dashboard is convenient: you can immediately see the balance, how much has been spent, the approximate cost of one request, and the average number of requests per day. Overall, everything is convenient.

Date of experience: янв 03, 2026