A provider with many restrictions. In particular, projects involving parsing, spam, mining, and other "malicious" activities are prohibited (almost everything can fall into this category). If any of this is detected, they ban without warning. It would be nice if they notified in advance (I got banned even though I wasn't at fault; the issue was with Windows, specifically LLMNR, which triggered multicast, causing the provider to send graphs of service activity). There are also limits on the total traffic of the virtual server. By default, it's set to 150 GB/day, and during tests, they even limit it to 30 GB. In this case, the speed isn't cut, but as soon as you exceed the limits, the speed drops to 5 Mbps. I didn't find any more drawbacks, but everything I mentioned can be found in the terms, which unfortunately no one reads. So it's worth remembering that certain types of activity can lead to a ban or speed restrictions. During my usage, I was quite satisfied with the provider's performance. Now, however, I'm on my own server since the rental period has expired.