Overall, the service does not fulfill its purpose; it simply does not see the text on the website or sees it in fragments, swallowing entire paragraphs and modules. However, the service initially lures you in, and without thinking, I paid the average cost. The uniqueness of the site is clear at a glance, and it's immediately obvious what needs to be worked on. But when you realize that it only sees part of the text, it becomes frustrating that such conveniences are nothing compared to the necessary accuracy of uniqueness indicators, as the service was created specifically for this but fails to deliver on its purpose.
Here’s my example:
I provide the address for checking the uniqueness of the page http://idea-save.ru/tovarnye-znaki/registraciya-tovarnogo-znaka.html with content of 9128 characters, but content-watch.ru sees only 3708 characters, and that includes the site menu, meaning it has swallowed 2/3 of the article's text on the page (if you exclude the site menu from its indexing, that’s about right).
The thing is, I simply didn’t notice its strange text extraction at first; why it doesn’t see the text remains a mystery to me, as their technical support completely ignores user questions and doesn’t respond at all.
